Kibocsátásbecslési eljárások és modellek összehasonlítása
Comparison of Emission Models and Processes / Compararea procedurilor și modelelor pentru evaluarea emisiilor
Keywords:
kobicsátásbecslés, emissziós modell, Mobile 6,2, MOVES, Global Calculator, TREMOVE, ForFITS, IEAAbstract
In this paper authors aim to compare the different transport related emission models and processes. Different models and different processes were elaborated in the last couple of decades to examine the effect of technical development on climatic issues. Some just covering technical parameters others are dealing with socio-economic parameters as well.
Kivonat
Cikkünkben a közlekedési kibocsátási eljárások becslésére szolgáló modelleket és eljárásokat kívánjuk bemutatni. Az elmúlt évtizedekben a modellek hatalmas fejlődésen mentek keresztül, a technológiai paraméterek mellett ma már a társadalmi-gazdasági paraméterek változását is figyelembe veszik.
References
Bennaceur, K., & Gielen, D. (2010). Energy technology modelling of major carbon abatement options. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(2), 309-315.
Fegyverneki Sándor (2009): Valószínűség-számítás és matematikai statisztika, TÁMOP 4.1.2-08/1/A-2009-0033 elektronikus jegyzet
Fontaras, G., Kouridis, H., Samaras, Z., Elst, D., & Gense, R. (2007). Use of a vehicle-modelling tool for predicting CO2 emissions in the framework of European regulations for light goods vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 41(14), 3009-3021.
Fulton, L., Cazzola, P., & Cuenot, F. (2009). IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3758-3768
Gielen, D., & Taylor, M. (2007). Modelling industrial energy use: the IEAs energy technology perspectives. Energy Economics, 29(4), 889-912
Kioutsioukis, I., Kouridis, C., Gkatzoflias, D., Dilara, P., & Ntziachristos, L. (2010). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of national road transport inventories compiled with COPERT 4. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7690-7691.
Lénárt Csaba, Nagy Ildikó (2007): Környezeti folyamatok modellezése – modellezés alapjai, HEFOP 3.3.1.,elektronikus jegyzet
Nakićenović, N., Swart, R. (2000): Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: a Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press
Pino-Cortés, E., Díaz-Robles, L. A., Cubillos, F., Fu, J. S., & Vergara-Fernández, A. (2015). Sensitivity analysis of biodiesel blends on Benzo [a] pyrene and main emissions using MOVES: A case study in Temuco, Chile. Science of The Total Environment, 537, 352-359
Siskos, P., Capros, P., & De Vita, A. (2015). CO2 and energy efficiency car standards in the EU in the context of a decarbonisation strategy: A model-based policy assessment. Energy Policy, 84, 22-34.
Taylor et al., 2012: An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 93(4) pp485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.
TML, 2007: Transport&Mobility Leuven: TREMOVE model description
UNDA, 2012: UNDA Seventh Tranche (2012): CO2 Emissions from Inland Transport: Statistics, Mitigation Polices, and Modelling Tools
UNECE (2013): ForFITS - User Manual
Wallace, H. W., Jobson, B. T., Erickson, M. H., McCoskey, J. K., VanReken, T. M., Lamb, B. K., ... & Zhang, W. (2012). Comparison of wintertime CO to NOx ratios to MOVES and MOBILE6. 2 on-road emissions inventories. Atmospheric Environment, 63, 289-297
Wu, Y., Song, G., & Yu, L. (2014). Sensitive analysis of emission rates in MOVES for developing site-specific emission database. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, 193-206
Yao, Z., Wei, H., Perugu, H., Liu, H., & Li, Z. (2014). Sensitivity analysis of project level MOVES running emission rates for light and heavy duty vehicles. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 1(2), 81-96.
Zhang, K., & Batterman, S. (2010). Near-road air pollutant concentrations of CO and PM 2.5: a comparison of MOBILE6. 2/CALINE4 and generalized additive models. Atmospheric Environment, 44(14), 1740-1748
